Before Context
Independent model pass
Model is prompted with only the standard prompt above.
Baseline output pending. Run a first pass before attaching evidence context.
Alex Rivera · Level 4 Stringer
Back to Dashboard
investigative
Verify municipal disruption signals in Fresno, CA - verification desk
Assigned by Senior Editor · education · Fresno, CA
$326Base Pay
News-desert support assignment for Fresno, CA. Validate two independent local sources, capture official bulletins, and document where public information is missing or delayed.
Fresno, CA
5/15/2026, 2:23:42 AM
available
Story Routing
Available · In Progress · Submitted · Returned / Approved
Readership Demand
1,000
+215% trend vs yesterday
Flow 4 · Field Intake
Capture uploads, links, and notes here. Everything syncs into the reporting workflow below.
Upload Photo / Video
Upload Document
Add Notes
External Link
Launch Copilot Tool
Flow 4 · Reporting Workflow
Stage your field evidence first, then run optional AI quality checks before submission.
Back to assignments
Verify municipal disruption signals in Fresno, CA - verification desk
$326
Overdue
Stage C (Optional) · AI Output Quality Check
Editor Note
News-desert support assignment for Fresno, CA. Validate two independent local sources, capture official bulletins, and document where public information is missing or delayed.
Resolve uncertain claims with source-backed evidence modules.
Complete all required modules and submit with reliability scoring.
Standard Prompt
You are a newsroom verification analyst. Review the event summary below and produce a concise incident brief. Event title: Verify municipal disruption signals in Fresno, CA - verification desk Location: Fresno, CA Editor brief: News-desert support assignment for Fresno, CA. Validate two independent local sources, capture official bulletins, and document where public information is missing or delayed. Output format: - What is known (3-5 bullets) - What is uncertain (2-4 bullets) - Risks if published now (1-3 bullets) - Next verification steps (3 bullets)
Second pass should reuse this prompt and append grounded context from uploaded files.
After Context
Evidence-informed model pass
Same prompt, augmented with uploaded files and source references.
No context-informed output attached yet.
Flow 4 Execution · Ingest, Validate, Submit
Stage A · Shared Evidence Inbox
Evidence from the top intake actions and module uploads appears in one stream.
No ingested evidence yet. Start with uploads, links, or notes.
Stage C (Optional) · AI Quality Judgments
Is it missing key context?
Stage C (Optional) · Ratings
Stage C (Optional) · Commentary
Stage A · Evidence Modules (0/2)
Local corroboration packsource claim
At least 2 named corroborations from local institutions or officials
Upload image / file evidence
Drag files here, or select files to upload with preview cards.
Official bulletin capturecollect document
Attach agency notices or district memos with timestamps
Upload image / file evidence
Drag files here, or select files to upload with preview cards.
Discussion (0)
No comments yet.
Stage B · Evidence CompleteStage C · QA Optional